In the tussle among the many Content Management Systems (CMS)  communities who are vying for more users is what might be the most common brag; “Our community is the most helpful!” As someone who works within three CMS platforms, i.e., Drupal, WordPress and Umbraco, I have found the Drupal community to be by far the most supportive. The community has many channels available for support. I have been surprised by what a helpful complement Internet Relay Chat (IRC) has been.

If time began with the Internet, than IRC and myself are primordial. I saw IRC and usenet as technologies that made sense before pretty user interfaces had become ubiquitous, and thus their continuation represented the equivalent of primary digital water coolers for bearded UNIX admin types. I wrongly presumed it was irrelevant. Additionally, I had been warned that many IRC groups are full of hard-core developers who don’t suffer beginner or intermediate level questions with any grace. As I have recently learned, I was wrong.

The North Carolina-based Drupal group maintains an active IRC channel (#drupal-nc on freenode). Despite my bias, curiosity led me to check it out. Over time, the value of it became obvious. There is on average about 15 people, many of whom simply leave their IRC client running (and thus aren’t there in the “active and watching the IRC stream” sense) but there’s nearly always someone paying attention and responding to questions or to greetings. As for responding, there is ample brainpower on display. These folks answer and discuss esoteric Drupal, PHP, MySQL, Apache, and other supporting technology questions with enviable facility. One can learn much by leaving the channel open and watching the discussions unfold. The group is very eager to help all questions, simple or esoteric.

Since joining this channel was so edifying, I added another channel to my irssi windowed view; the main #drupal channel. The volume of activity is much higher than #drupal-nc, perhaps by a factor of ten. The stream is constant (irssi updates at least every minute, sometimes rapid-fire) and there’s hundreds of “nicks” logged in at any time. The geographic scope is global; and one must presume he is not conversing with a North American, which makes conversations much more interesting. Roughly one in three questions are the type where a cynic might respond with a “Google it” but rarely have I seen that. Indeed, even better than “Googling it” is some excellent functionality that an IRC bot, “druplicon” provides all freenode Drupal channels. You can pass a Drupal URL and druplicon will provide a contextual response that helps to provide clarity in a technical discussion. You can ask it simple questions, such as a module name and a question mark, and druplicon responds with summary project information. It’s a clever way to leverage such a combination of old and new-ish technologies.

Here’s a great page on using IRC on the Drupal channel. Actually, there are several great irc-related pages for drupal there that I just discovered.

I use the irssi command-line client and I love it. It has low memory footprint (unlike the monster that Skype is. Note to self: convince my single Skype-loving client to switch to a private IRC channel?)

So, if you’re going to say you’ve got a friendly community, Drupal has set a very high bar to reach. Yea, I’m looking at you, umbraco!

I had an interesting experience recently that encapsulates my experience with two CMS communities; umbraco and drupal. I had tweeted about my moving what is currently an umbraco 4.0.1 site to a Drupal 7.x site. This started an interesting conversation about why the move? Several umbraco fans (or what I call “umbracians,”) wondered why the move and sought more feedback from me. Being in the throes of developing a theme, I explained that while I still find umbraco a brilliant CMS (particularly considering what it sits on top of) that Drupal makes a lot of sense in the low-end web site space, especially with tight web development budgets. For the record, no Drupal fans stepped into the fray, which I expected. Regardless, I know I can count on both community when it matters, e.g., when I’m stuck on a technical or modeling issue.

One twitter user asked me for a constructive “why for the move?” Given how helpful the umbraco community is, I wanted to be clear on why I prefer Drupal over Umbraco. (Remember I offer this filed under “there’s no accounting for taste”)

  • The .NET licensing debacle. Sorry; I try and continue to work on my .NET skills but I don’t like MS’s restrictive, costly and constrictive licensing. This plays out in many ways, in one example, restricting my flexibility in quickly cobbling sandboxes. With open source software, the licensing allows me to have multiple virtualized OS’es as needed, created and scrapped as easily as files themselves. I can build, test, destroy and refine without caring about migrating my OS or development environment licensing as appropriate. It’s a major nuisance.
  • While WebMatrix is an interesting, if very nascent, effort by Microsoft to address portions of what I write above, one quickly hits the wall of what you can do and you find yourself needing a full development environment. That is; Microsoft Visual Studio. Sorry, but I greatly resent having to install 2+ GB to run VS. Intellisense is cute; but given all the time I’ve spent in vim, the “enhancements” offered by VS feel like training wheels, not productivity enhancements.
    Sidenote: For someone my age, I’m struck by the irony. MS was chided for it’s command-line starkness and poor Windows UI in the 90′s, where as Apple had a well-designed UI but poor or non-existent shell. Now I look to Ubuntu, Cent OS, Mac and others for an excellent shell and excellent GUI, but now Microsoft fails to offer a premier-class UI or shell. Adequate; not premier.
  • Bloatware. The two factors, above, adds up to extensively consumed disk space. My Dell is a dual-partition laptop, ubuntu weighs in at 20% usage for a 10GB partition. Windows Server 2008 weighs in at 80% usage on a 70 GB partition. So much disk space consumed for such little comparative value.
  • Web host pricing. I’ve found much better LAMP vendors than .NET vendors with greater variety, pricing and support levels. I expect that, again, licensing restricts what kind of support and pricing .NET platforms can offer. My MySQL vendors allow me to create up to 20+ databases. My .NET MS-SQL vendors? One database, and pay as I need more, or the plan is priced accordingly. Of course, as they pay per database. I’m happy to report I’ve found a solid .NET vendor that I can heartily recommend; as I also know of another whom I look forward to our quick parting.
  • I love the Umbraco spirit and community. They are very good about responding to my questions at their support site. Yet, as umbraco’s community isn’t the size of Drupal, there is a disparity in the amount of packages/modules available to each. So, while I greatly appreciate their helpfulness, I find myself “rolling my own” solutions, which adds time to a project. Additionally, I’m closer to the front end of site development than the back end. I prefer theming and snapping in functionality, not building the functionality.
  • Establish an Umbraco “core” directory structure: Updating umbraco is not easy, particularly if you’ve extended umbraco which one will almost certainly have to, as with any CMS. All binaries go into a single /bin folder. I like the drupal core model. Leave core alone, and updates are trivial (in comparison.) My guess is that umbraco could develop a comparable core directory structure.
  • Lack of a “status report” Drupal’s status report provides an environmental “dashboard” as it regards the server, it’s configuration and capabilities. This feature in Drupal is priceless, in particular when working on commodity hosting vendors. Inversely, I’ve been bit hard by the lack of such a dashboard or overview in umbraco; “trust level” “application pool” settings and other aspects. They have a rudimentary one in their installer that tests for fundamental support, that would be a good start.
So I haven’t said what I like about umbraco, and there’s a lot to like. One of our umbraco sites is a top performer in many respects. I love theming in umbraco; I much prefer it to the bipolar Drupal/php theming method. php theming is, well, butt-fugly. I love having direct-editing access to all my site files via the umbraco backend UI. And there’s more.
Umbraco remains a valuable asset in my toolbag; but I will be giving the node to Drupal for now.
So what’s up with WordPress? That’s for another post, though, ironically, I use WordPress for this very blog.

The cliché is that you only get a single chance at first impressions. In this case, we’ve got an exception. I’m talking about the CMS framework Umbraco. First, a little history. In 2007 we identified the need to move a customer’s 1200-page, includes-based site, into a CMS. The site was growing from one language to seven. We wanted an MS-friendly CMS, (the client is MS-centeric in its IT) but we wanted an open-source licensed framework, as I’ve grown to appreciate the support and community that an open-source projects offer. After performing extensive research, we settled on Umbraco. Read the rest of this entry »

Huh. Turns out mutlisite drupal and placing files at a directory’s root added a layer of complexity I hadn’t planned on. I used image module and views, which is just as well, as it has other advantages, such as using image nodes.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE